HA HA HA bigot

2

Labels:

A diarist on Kos introduced me to a truly beautiful idiot question and beatdown response in the "Ask Amy" ("Dear Abby") column today.

Dear Amy: My husband and I have lived in our quiet suburban Denver neighborhood for six years.

About two years ago two young gay men moved in across the street. They've taken the ugliest, most run-down property in the neighborhood and remodeled and transformed it into the pride of the street.

When it snows, they shovel out my car and are friendly, yet they mostly keep to themselves.

Last month I went out to retrieve my newspaper and watched them kiss each other goodbye and embrace as they each left for work.

I was appalled that they would do something like that in plain view of everyone.

I was so disturbed that I spoke to my pastor. He encouraged me to draft a letter telling them how much we appreciate their help but asking them to refrain from that behavior in our neighborhood.

I did so and asked a few of our neighbors to sign it.

Since I delivered it, I've not been able to get them to even engage me in conversation.

I offer greetings but they've chosen to ignore me.

They have made it so uncomfortable for the other neighbors and me by not even acknowledging our presence.

How would you suggest we open communications with them and explain to them that we value their contributions to the neighborhood but will not tolerate watching unnatural and disturbing behavior.

-- Wondering


Dear Wondering: You're lucky that these gentlemen merely choose to ignore you.

Your neighbors could respond to your hospitality by hosting weekly outdoor "gay pride" barbecues and inviting all of their friends to enjoy life on your quiet suburban street.

I can hold out hope that they will choose to do this, but I'm spiteful in that way. Your neighbors sound much more kind.

In your original petition to these men, you basically stated that while you value them when they are raising the standard on your street and shoveling your driveway, you loathe them for being who they are.

The only way to open communication with your neighbors would be to start by apologizing to them for engaging your other neighbors in your campaign. Because you don't sound likely to apologize, you are just going to have to tolerate being ignored.

Christ, sounds like "Wondering" was catching a bout of the vapors! I declare!

How do people not only think things like this, but take the time to write them out, and then hit Send, and not stop and realize, "God, I'm the biggest fucking hypocrite moron in the country!"

Snowed

0

Labels:

It's damn near a white-out today in Madison, Wisconsin, so I'm going to take some time to vent about a bunch of crap.

1) Ann Coulter committed a felony

Yes, She-of-the-Suspicious-Adam's-Apple. "Ms." Coulter moved to Palm Beach, Florida, recently, and registered to vote using an address on Indian Road. Unfortunately for her, Ann Coulter never lived on Indian Road. Ever. And as such, her signature on the registration form that bears the strength of a sworn statement, and carries penalties equal to
perjury, means that she is by rule guilty of a third degree felony. This means a fine of up to $5,000 and up to five years in prison. And you know who did own the Indian Road home? Ann's real estate agent, Suzanne Frisbie. And she knows details about Ann's felony of forethought. And you know what that is? A THIRD DEGREE FELONY, TOO. Ms. Frisbie's e-mail address is on her Corcoran Realty site above; send her a polite note to let her know that her public statements on this issue are incriminating her of violation Florida State Statute 777.03(1)(a) (accessory after the fact). There is no "realtor/client privilege." Ann Coulter and her agent need to pay a price for breaking the law.

2) Right wing activists continue to manipulate veterans

I don't know all the areas in which this repulsive ad is playing, but keep your eyes peeled for the "Midwest Heroes" spot featuring some earnest-looking veterans spewing right-wing talking points. Laura Barcella at AlterNet has a good post about it, as does Hesiod on Daily Kos. Click through to the video if you absolutely must. And once you've read about this, click on this last link and ask yourself whether truth or fiction is stranger.

3) Dick Cheney shot a guy in the face

There isn't a lot to say here. Dick Cheney shot a guy in the face. Stick to Raw Story for really good reporting. It's happening too fast for me to blog it. Just remember, Dick Cheney shot a guy in the face. And download the MP3 from a fellow named Josh Honigstock at Audiostreet.com. It's not for the kids necessarily, but all the words are by George W. Bush, so if your kids watch the news (please say they do), then they've already had the chance to hear them all.

Have a good day, and stay safe if you're getting snowed.

It doesn't matter if you have nothing to hide

0

Labels:

Do you have telephone coverage from any of these companies?

Verizon. AT&T (now Cingular). Sprint.

If so, then the warrantless domestic surveillance issue directly affects you.

If you think you have nothing to hide, then tell me why you wouldn't stand in the public square and tell the whole world the results of your latest mammogram, prostate exam, or blood test for an infectious disease.

Because if you talked about these things on the phone with your doctor, then the government could have listened to you. And if you hadn't told your employer or your insurer about these issues, and the government had this information on you, and felt it was pertinent, do you honestly think they wouldn't tell one of those entities about the supposed "risk" you posed to their bottom lines?

Contact Senators Russell Feingold and Edward Kennedy to give them your support for their push to view the records of the above-mentioned companies about their complicity in the NSA domestic spying program.

Wouldn't you want to know who was eavesdropping on your private conversations, and why?

This is my BOY in '08

1 |

Labels:

(taken from The Daily Kos, which you can visit directly by clicking on the link along the right-hand side of this page)


Pre-1776 Mentality
by Senator Russ Feingold
Thu Feb 02, 2006 at 08:58:01 AM PDT

I've seen some strange things in my life, but I cannot describe the feeling I had, sitting on the House floor during Tuesday's State of the Union speech, listening to the President assert that his executive power is, basically, absolute, and watching several members of Congress stand up and cheer him on. It was surreal and disrespectful to our system of government and to the oath that as elected officials we have all sworn to uphold. Cheering? Clapping? Applause? All for violating the law?

The President and his administration continue their spin and media blitz in attempts to defend the fact that they broke, and continue to break, the law. Their weak and shifting justifications for doing so continue. The latest from the President seems to be that basically the FISA law, passed in 1978,
is out of date. His decision that he can apparently disregard "old law" fits the pattern with the President and his administration. He's decided to disregard a statute (FISA) and the Constitution (the 4th Amendment) by continuing to wiretap Americans' phone calls and emails without the required warrant, while at the same time claiming powers of the presidency that do not exist. (Perhaps he feels the Constitution is too "old," as well.) This administration reacts to any questions about spying on American citizens by saying that those of us who stand up for our rights and freedoms are somehow living in a "pre-September 11th, 2001 world."

In fact, the President is living in a pre-1776 world.

Our Founders lived in dangerous times, and they risked everything for freedom. Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." The President's pre-1776 mentality is hurting America and fracturing the foundation on which our country has stood for 230 years. The President can't just bypass two branches of government, and obey only those laws he wants to obey. Deciding unilaterally which of our freedoms still apply in the fight against terrorism is unacceptable and needs to be stopped immediately.

Many of you saw this week's story in the Washington Post on the exchange Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and I had during his confirmation hearing in January of last year. Mr. Gonzales misled me and the Senate Judiciary Committee under oath about whether the President could spy on Americans without a warrant. (Many of you blogged about it when the story first broke and I thank you for getting the word out.) That exchange is extremely telling about the depths to which this administration will go to grab power. I look forward to a little more honesty from the Attorney General when he testifies about the spying program before the Judiciary Committee on Monday.

I don't have to tell you how important this issue is. It gets to the core of what we as a country are all about. We all agree that we must defeat the terrorists who threaten the safety and security of our families and loved ones. Why does this President feel we must sacrifice our freedoms to fight terrorism? This is a gut check moment for members of Congress. Do we sacrifice our liberty? Do we bow to those who try to use security issues for political gain? Do we stand and applaud when the President places himself above the law? Or, do we say enough?

Stop the power grab, stop the politics, stop breaking the law.

It's time to stand up - not to cheer, but to fight back.