Are you calling my car gay?

0

I'm having a hard time reconciling my eagerness to test drive the new Toyota Yaris with my bitterness that the Echo was discontinued. While very different in terms of styling and modernity, the Yaris and the Echo fill the exact same slot in Toyota's lineup. So what was so wrong with the Echo?

Well, it was born under a bad sign, frankly. Travel back in your mind to the year 2000...economy flush with cash, gas at less than $1.75, SUVs and trucks topping the auto sales charts...good times. Good times. Unless you were Toyota, trying to launch a strange-looking little sedan whose main selling point was that it was cheap (if they all had gold spokes like over there, maybe we wouldn't be having this conversation). Well, duh.

I guess I should be surprised that the Echo lasted through 2005. But really, shouldn't it have done better and better as gas prices continued to skyrocket? I mean, 40MPG is 40MPG, no matter how odd the car looks, right?

The answer is, of course, YES, you DOOFUS! Of COURSE it should have done better. But it was doomed to live its life as a "girl car" or "that ugly little Toyota." Even decent sales and a modern ad campaign at the start didn't defuse the criticism that it was a flop from the start.

Now comes the Yaris, and I like it. In fact, I like it more than the Echo (in terms of aesthetic value, anyway). In a year or so, I might look to pick one up. But I'll be damned if I ever concede that my Echo was a failure. Ain't nothin' ever failed on that little guy.

News announcement

1 |

Labels:

This Saturday is my birthday. Time for a relaunch.

You'll find a little less politics, and a little more everything else, here at Reading this will not make you popular in the future. If you want my politics with a less filtered delivery method, go to my Daily Kos page (here).

I'm gonna try to make this blog a little less podunk, a little more polished. Let me know what you think, as I roll stuff out in the next few days.

I Want Higher Taxes: A Deconstruction

0

Labels:

cross-posted on my DailyKos page

I swear, if I have to hear Ed Schultz say "Listen! Nobody wants higher taxes! But these Bush tax cuts are" blah blah blah, I'm going to throw my radio out the window.

So maybe on Impeachment Day, a rant on tax and syntax is a little dry. I don't care. This has been bugging me for weeks, and I'm boiling over.

Let me just say it straight out: I WANT HIGHER TAXES.

What I do not want is government corruption and misuse of my tax dollars. When money is given to the government, the intent is that services are rendered on the taxpayer's behalf. It's a financial transaction, not protection money.

If I pay $5 per gallon of gasoline, and $3 of that is tax, and I get a free college education in return, that's cool with me.

If I pay 7% sales tax, but my state gives me free health care, I'm not going to complain.

The fact that many liberals are forced to (in addition to not calling themselves "liberals") precede every comment on tax issues by saying "nobody wants higher taxes" is evidence that the conservative movement has intimidated and scared this country for too long. When The Heritage Foundation gets sound bites on CNN, without a front-paged counterweight to their bullshit, then we have been hoodwinked.

They have told us that government cannot be trusted with your money. They have told us that reliance on government to provide services to its citizens is weak and "European-effete." They appeal to people's self-interest by saying "it's your money." They have sold this idea of "tax cuts" to us as a good thing, and then used those tax cuts to reward the corporate entities that steal our benefits, pensions, wages, and jobs.

I don't want a tax cut if that's the cost (and it is the cost, as we know). We're going to be expected to give some of our hard-earned money to the government whether we like our government or not. It is our right and duty to demand not necessarily lower taxes, but complete transparency and responsibility in government spending.

You're damn right it's my money. And when I give it to you, George, I want something other than war and wiretaps back for it.

Fuck you, W

0

Labels:

Seriously. FUCK YOU.

It has finally been confirmed via diligent journalism and conscience-driven informants that the National Security Agency is not only spying on foreign nationals and the Americans who might communicate with them, but on Americans communicating with other Americans within the borders of the United States.

George W. Bush, you didn't listen to our voices when we elected Al Gore in 2000.

You didn't listen to our voices when we said that we didn't care what kind of lipstick you put on it--privatization of social security was still an ugly pig of an idea.

You didn't listen to our voices when Ohio's electoral system was raped by your cronies, and the people's legitimate vote was stolen from them in 2004.

You didn't listen when FEMA and the National Weather Service told you that a Category 3 (much less a 4) hurricane making landfall in the Gulf could breach the levees meant to protect American land and lives.

You didn't listen when New Orleans cried out from the depths for relief.

You haven't been listening to our voices as we've been screaming at the top of our lungs that the Iraq War is hopeless, and the best way to support the troops is to bring them home and keep them alive.

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU LISTENING FOR NOW, YOU SON OF A BITCH?

The neocons' wet dream

0

Labels:

"Their house is their fortress -- good for them," [Russian President Vladimir Putin] said. "But that means that we also must make our house strong and reliable."

"We must always be ready to counter any attempts to pressure Russia in order to strengthen positions at our expense," Putin said. "The stronger our military is, the less temptation there will be to exert such pressure on us." *


You could fill in the name "Nikita Khrushchev" or "Joseph Stalin" and that statement wouldn't be changed in the least.

In my previous post "
Uneasy suspicion," I asked what new role we were apparently trying to get Russia to play. It looked then like we were trying (in a somewhat silly way) to make Russia look both bumbling and evil. Perhaps this is projection on the part of the White House, as "both bumbling and evil" is just how I would describe our current administration.

Readers, this is where modern Republicans will take us: back to the Cold War. When the Cold War ended, the neocon movement really began. There was no more bad guy.

Al Qaeda might have been the bad guy, but they were too hard to catch (aww, do I have to capture bin Laden?).

The neocons tried to make Iraq the bad guy, but the lie was so bald-faced that even the easily-convinced American public isn't buying it.

They wanted to make Iran the bad guy, but a bad guy won't send you a letter discussing future negotiations and how we can cooperate together. That one is just going to get quietly invaded, and all economic advantage absorbed, and then we'll just move on.

So, hey! Why not good old Russia? Pootie-Poot hasn't really been cooperating with Dick lately, so let's throw him under the bus. We'll shoot a few disses at him, and see if we can't get him to say something that just happens to force our hand!

November 2006 - VOTE, and VOTE PROGRESSIVE
November 2008 - VOTE, and VOTE PROGRESSIVE

I swear to god, you better realize by now that unless you're a millionaire, this administration and their ilk are not working in your best interests. If you're a Republican, ask yourself where your priorities were before W came in, and how well he is representing those priorities. If you're a Democrat, you've got NO EXCUSE. Donate your money, your time, and your voice to supporting true progressivism.

Unless you like the Cold War, and then I guess you're pretty well satisfied.